How does punishment imposed on one person affect thousands of others?
One man’s punishment becomes a message to thousands when it is public, politically understandable and the limits of the next punishment are not clear. People see that someone has lost their job, freedom, income or reputation after criticism and do not have to wait for a personal threat to assess their own risk.
They begin to avoid the topic, organization or even contact with the punished person, which expands its isolation. Uncertainty often enhances the effect: if no one knows what exactly is “too much”, many withdraw much further than the authorities specifically asked. Nevertheless, silence is difficult to measure and people can withdraw for other reasons. The best evidence combines the order of events, comparison of affected and unaffected groups, surveys and concrete changes.
When a worker loses a contract after refusing a party task or a journalist has suffered attacks for months, thousands of people do not have to receive a personal threat. They observe the price and adapt: they do not sign the support, they do not give the document to the journalist, they do not report pressure or they choose silence. In Serbia, qualitative research shows that stories about the consequences spread through the collective and the local community much faster than official protection.
How the finding is separated in the matrix
CRTA’s investigations of political pressures record testimonies of fear, examples of retaliation and preventive adjustment, while monitoring attacks on journalists shows long-term impunity. FemPlatz records changes in the sense of security and daily routines, while YIHR states that some targeted participants of the regional school have withdrawn from public space or become more cautious.
The punishment produces deterrence when it is visible, when the reason is understood by everyone and when the institution does not show that it will protect the next person.
Yes the effect of intimidation appears clearly in the testimonies, although the number of people who changed their behavior is not precisely measured.
People react differently: the same punishment scares someone, makes someone angry. Qualitative findings explain the mechanism, but do not give a representative percentage of its range.
People can withdraw for other reasons, and it is those who are silent that are the most difficult to study. The most reliable conclusion combines surveys, changes over time and traces of behavior.
Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.
review more research
Earl, J. i Braithwaite, J. M. (2022), „Layers of Political Repression: Integrating Research on Social Movement Repression“, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18: 227–248.
- Contribution to this answer
- Earl and Braithwaite show that the consequences of repression should not only be viewed through direct harm to the person or organization being punished. The repression enters a wider system in which different actors observe what is happening and adapt their next decisions but this review does not specifically measure the effect of one public case on thousands of observers.
Explain how the system works
Ritter, E. H. i Conrad, C. R. (2016), „Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression“, American Political Science Review 110(1): 85–99.
- Contribution to this answer
- Ritter and Conrad give an important part of the mechanism: citizens and authorities act in anticipation of each other’s behavior. If people expect repression before they become involved, part of the opposition will never become visible meaning that the consequences of repression exist among people who have never been punished themselves.
study of Iran and international technology firms
Conduit, D. (2025), „Digital Authoritarianism and the Global Technology Industry: Evidence from Iran“, Government and Opposition 60(3): 751–772.
- Contribution to this answer
- Conduit shows how digital technology increases the ability of the regime to find and punish individuals and how foreign companies can be part of that system. This increases the credibility of the threat, but the work does not directly study how the example of a punished person deters other people.
review more research
Kuran, T. (1995), Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification, Harvard University Press.
- Contribution to this answer
- The Koran gives the purest social mechanism in this five: one does not have to be punished alone to hide what one thinks it is enough to estimate that honesty could have a political or social cost. When many make the same assessment, the punishment or expectation of punishment produces a much wider circle of public silence than the number of directly punished people shows.
comparing several countries or cases
Feldstein, S. (2021), The Rise of Digital Repression: How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance, Oxford University Press.
- Contribution to this answer
- Feldstein shows how digital surveillance and targeted punishment enable authorities to more accurately link political behavior to concrete consequences. This helps us understand why the example of a targeted activist can make a threat more believable to others, but the book does not test the demonstration effect of one case directly.
Sources supporting the Serbia example, with the claim they support and their limitations.
Domestic NGOs qualitative field research - Verified 21.08.2026
CRTA. 2023. Mreža političkih pritisaka u centrima za socijalni rad. Beograd: CRTA.
CRTA. 2023. Network of political pressures in centers for social work. Belgrade: CRTA.
- What the source records
- Testimonials describe centers as points in a hierarchical network in which business, contract and assistance can be linked to political loyalty and electoral mobilization.
- Claim it supports
- The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
- Source limitation
- The sample is qualitative and anonymous; the findings reveal mechanisms and patterns, but do not measure their frequency in all centers.
Domestic NGOs qualitative election research - Verified 21.08.2026
CRTA. 2022. Preliminarni izveštaj o izbornom nasilju i korupciji. Beograd: CRTA.
CRTA. 2022. Preliminary report on electoral violence and corruption. Belgrade: CRTA.
- What the source records
- The report describes repeated patterns of reward and punishment towards fixed-term employees, party members, poor and other dependent groups.
- Claim it supports
- The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
- Source limitation
- The deliberate and “snowball” pattern is not representative and the statements are not the same as the legally established facts in any case.
Domestic journalistic association monitoring of attacks - Verified 21.08.2026
Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije (NUNS). 2026. NUNS retrospektiva 2025: godina u kojoj je pritisak postao sistem. Beograd: NUNS.
Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS). 2026. NUNS retrospective 2025: the year in which pressure became a system. Belgrade: NUNS.
- What the source records
- NUNS recorded 371 cases, including 113 physical attacks and 165 threats, along with legal, economic and digital forms of pressure.
- Claim it supports
- The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
- Source limitation
- The register depends on the reported and documented cases, it can overlap with other databases and does not measure the experience of every journalist.
Domestic NGOs annual report of legal aid - Verified 21.08.2026
Komitet pravnika za ljudska prava — YUCOM. 2024. YUCOM 2022–2024, godišnji izveštaj br. 11–12. Beograd: YUCOM.
Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights YUCOM. 2024. YUCOM 202224, annual report No. 11. Belgrade: YUCOM.
- What the source records
- The report documents the gap between judicial reforms and citizens’ experience, the pressure on independence and the obstacles for vulnerable groups to receive effective legal protection.
- Claim it supports
- The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
- Source limitation
- It is the report of the organization that provides legal aid and advocates reforms; the choice of cases is not representative for all courts and all disputes.
Domestic NGOs exploratory qualitative research - Verified 21.08.2026
FemPlatz. 2025. Između megafona i tišine: žene u borbi za promene. Pančevo: FemPlatz.
FemPlatz. 2025. Between megaphone and silence: women in the fight for change. Pančevo: FemPlatz.
- What the source records
- “It records visible attacks, changes in security and consequences for the daily routines of protesting women.
- Claim it supports
- He gives an example of how the public punishment of a participant sends a message to a much wider circle of potential participants.
- Source limitation
- The sample is not representative, the research is exploratory, and the database of incidents is not intentionally complete; the findings show patterns and experiences, not their frequency in the entire population.
Domestic NGOs documented case study - Verified 21.08.2026
Inicijativa mladih za ljudska prava. 2026. Dosije Hrvatska II: Proterivanje, targetiranje i drugi primeri kršenja ljudskih prava građana i građanki Hrvatske u Srbiji. Beograd: YIHR Srbija.
Youth Initiative for Human Rights. 2026. File Croatia II: Expulsion, targeting and other examples of violations of human rights of Croatian citizens in Serbia. Belgrade: YIHR Serbia.
- What the source records
- Notes that some targeted participants of the regional school have withdrawn from the public space or become more cautious.
- Claim it supports
- It gives an immediate example of a deterrent effect: the punishment of one group changes the behavior of a much wider circle of young people.
- Source limitation
- It documents certain affected persons and the media pattern; it does not show that all foreign citizens are treated equally or that Serbia systematically persecutes its own critics abroad.
Is a relevant source missing? Send it to us.
Suggest a source or report an error in this answer →