SR/EN
AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAVtokratija

How the authoritarian system works in Serbia

General research connected to documented examples, findings, and sources from Serbia.

100questions
20areas
148academic works
130Serbia sources
Go to the general AUTLASExplore general mechanisms of authoritarian systems without the Serbia evidence layer.

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

AVtokratija›How the system punishes and intimidates without open violence
78
Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

How does punishment imposed on one person affect thousands of others?

Confidence in the conclusionquite substantiated, with important conditions
key academic works5
linked Serbia sources6
Period201226

One man’s punishment becomes a message to thousands when it is public, politically understandable and the limits of the next punishment are not clear. People see that someone has lost their job, freedom, income or reputation after criticism and do not have to wait for a personal threat to assess their own risk.

They begin to avoid the topic, organization or even contact with the punished person, which expands its isolation. Uncertainty often enhances the effect: if no one knows what exactly is “too much”, many withdraw much further than the authorities specifically asked. Nevertheless, silence is difficult to measure and people can withdraw for other reasons. The best evidence combines the order of events, comparison of affected and unaffected groups, surveys and concrete changes.

Example from SerbiaChecked connection 6 sources; waiting for saturation pass
6 related sources; Serbia records satellite pass not yet done

When a worker loses a contract after refusing a party task or a journalist has suffered attacks for months, thousands of people do not have to receive a personal threat. They observe the price and adapt: they do not sign the support, they do not give the document to the journalist, they do not report pressure or they choose silence. In Serbia, qualitative research shows that stories about the consequences spread through the collective and the local community much faster than official protection.

How the finding is separated in the matrix

01Established fact

CRTA’s investigations of political pressures record testimonies of fear, examples of retaliation and preventive adjustment, while monitoring attacks on journalists shows long-term impunity. FemPlatz records changes in the sense of security and daily routines, while YIHR states that some targeted participants of the regional school have withdrawn from public space or become more cautious.

02Our interpretation

The punishment produces deterrence when it is visible, when the reason is understood by everyone and when the institution does not show that it will protect the next person.

03Does it show the same process?

Yes the effect of intimidation appears clearly in the testimonies, although the number of people who changed their behavior is not precisely measured.

04Important caveat or alternative explanation

People react differently: the same punishment scares someone, makes someone angry. Qualitative findings explain the mechanism, but do not give a representative percentage of its range.

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

People can withdraw for other reasons, and it is those who are silent that are the most difficult to study. The most reliable conclusion combines surveys, changes over time and traces of behavior.

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

review more research

Earl, J. i Braithwaite, J. M. (2022), „Layers of Political Repression: Integrating Research on Social Movement Repression“, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 18: 227–248.

Contribution to this answer
Earl and Braithwaite show that the consequences of repression should not only be viewed through direct harm to the person or organization being punished. The repression enters a wider system in which different actors observe what is happening and adapt their next decisions but this review does not specifically measure the effect of one public case on thousands of observers.
Open source ↗
A02

Explain how the system works

Ritter, E. H. i Conrad, C. R. (2016), „Preventing and Responding to Dissent: The Observational Challenges of Explaining Strategic Repression“, American Political Science Review 110(1): 85–99.

Contribution to this answer
Ritter and Conrad give an important part of the mechanism: citizens and authorities act in anticipation of each other’s behavior. If people expect repression before they become involved, part of the opposition will never become visible meaning that the consequences of repression exist among people who have never been punished themselves.
Open source ↗
A03

study of Iran and international technology firms

Conduit, D. (2025), „Digital Authoritarianism and the Global Technology Industry: Evidence from Iran“, Government and Opposition 60(3): 751–772.

Contribution to this answer
Conduit shows how digital technology increases the ability of the regime to find and punish individuals and how foreign companies can be part of that system. This increases the credibility of the threat, but the work does not directly study how the example of a punished person deters other people.
Open source ↗
A04

review more research

Kuran, T. (1995), Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification, Harvard University Press.

Contribution to this answer
The Koran gives the purest social mechanism in this five: one does not have to be punished alone to hide what one thinks it is enough to estimate that honesty could have a political or social cost. When many make the same assessment, the punishment or expectation of punishment produces a much wider circle of public silence than the number of directly punished people shows.
Open source ↗
A05

comparing several countries or cases

Feldstein, S. (2021), The Rise of Digital Repression: How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance, Oxford University Press.

Contribution to this answer
Feldstein shows how digital surveillance and targeted punishment enable authorities to more accurately link political behavior to concrete consequences. This helps us understand why the example of a targeted activist can make a threat more believable to others, but the book does not test the demonstration effect of one case directly.
Open source ↗

Sources supporting the Serbia example, with the claim they support and their limitations.

S01

Domestic NGOs qualitative field research - Verified 21.08.2026

CRTA. 2023. Mreža političkih pritisaka u centrima za socijalni rad. Beograd: CRTA.

CRTA. 2023. Network of political pressures in centers for social work. Belgrade: CRTA.

What the source records
Testimonials describe centers as points in a hierarchical network in which business, contract and assistance can be linked to political loyalty and electoral mobilization.
Claim it supports
The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
Source limitation
The sample is qualitative and anonymous; the findings reveal mechanisms and patterns, but do not measure their frequency in all centers.
Open source ↗
S02

Domestic NGOs qualitative election research - Verified 21.08.2026

CRTA. 2022. Preliminarni izveštaj o izbornom nasilju i korupciji. Beograd: CRTA.

CRTA. 2022. Preliminary report on electoral violence and corruption. Belgrade: CRTA.

What the source records
The report describes repeated patterns of reward and punishment towards fixed-term employees, party members, poor and other dependent groups.
Claim it supports
The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
Source limitation
The deliberate and “snowball” pattern is not representative and the statements are not the same as the legally established facts in any case.
Open source ↗
S03

Domestic journalistic association monitoring of attacks - Verified 21.08.2026

Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije (NUNS). 2026. NUNS retrospektiva 2025: godina u kojoj je pritisak postao sistem. Beograd: NUNS.

Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS). 2026. NUNS retrospective 2025: the year in which pressure became a system. Belgrade: NUNS.

What the source records
NUNS recorded 371 cases, including 113 physical attacks and 165 threats, along with legal, economic and digital forms of pressure.
Claim it supports
The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
Source limitation
The register depends on the reported and documented cases, it can overlap with other databases and does not measure the experience of every journalist.
Open source ↗
S04

Domestic NGOs annual report of legal aid - Verified 21.08.2026

Komitet pravnika za ljudska prava — YUCOM. 2024. YUCOM 2022–2024, godišnji izveštaj br. 11–12. Beograd: YUCOM.

Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights YUCOM. 2024. YUCOM 202224, annual report No. 11. Belgrade: YUCOM.

What the source records
The report documents the gap between judicial reforms and citizens’ experience, the pressure on independence and the obstacles for vulnerable groups to receive effective legal protection.
Claim it supports
The claim that a visible punishment affects a much wider circle when everyone understands the political reason and the protection remains weak.
Source limitation
It is the report of the organization that provides legal aid and advocates reforms; the choice of cases is not representative for all courts and all disputes.
Open source ↗
S05

Domestic NGOs exploratory qualitative research - Verified 21.08.2026

FemPlatz. 2025. Između megafona i tišine: žene u borbi za promene. Pančevo: FemPlatz.

FemPlatz. 2025. Between megaphone and silence: women in the fight for change. Pančevo: FemPlatz.

What the source records
“It records visible attacks, changes in security and consequences for the daily routines of protesting women.
Claim it supports
He gives an example of how the public punishment of a participant sends a message to a much wider circle of potential participants.
Source limitation
The sample is not representative, the research is exploratory, and the database of incidents is not intentionally complete; the findings show patterns and experiences, not their frequency in the entire population.
Open source ↗
S06

Domestic NGOs documented case study - Verified 21.08.2026

Inicijativa mladih za ljudska prava. 2026. Dosije Hrvatska II: Proterivanje, targetiranje i drugi primeri kršenja ljudskih prava građana i građanki Hrvatske u Srbiji. Beograd: YIHR Srbija.

Youth Initiative for Human Rights. 2026. File Croatia II: Expulsion, targeting and other examples of violations of human rights of Croatian citizens in Serbia. Belgrade: YIHR Serbia.

What the source records
Notes that some targeted participants of the regional school have withdrawn from the public space or become more cautious.
Claim it supports
It gives an immediate example of a deterrent effect: the punishment of one group changes the behavior of a much wider circle of young people.
Source limitation
It documents certain affected persons and the media pattern; it does not show that all foreign citizens are treated equally or that Serbia systematically persecutes its own critics abroad.
Open source ↗

ABOUT US AND OUR METHODOLOGY

Many sources. Clear methodology. Verifiable answers.

AUTLAS is a public knowledge platform about how authoritarian systems work. It turns research findings into clear answers to the questions people ask when trying to understand elections, media, institutions, public resources, pressure, and everyday life in an authoritarian system.

01

Based on academic research

The answers are based on relevant academic research on authoritarian systems, democratic backsliding, institutional capture, and the narrowing of civic rights and freedoms. AUTLAS connects findings from scholarly articles, books, and comparative studies and presents them in language accessible to the wider public.

02

Practice documented in Serbia

AVtokratija is the Serbia case study within AUTLAS. It uses reports, analyses, and data from civil society organizations, independent institutions, professional associations, investigative media, and other relevant sources. General findings and evidence from Serbia are presented separately.

03

Sources open to scrutiny

Each answer lists the sources used. Visitors can check which research, data, and reports underpin the conclusions. The authors of the research and the organizations that collected the data remain clearly credited.

04

Why questions?

Knowledge about authoritarian systems is scattered across scholarly papers, books, databases, and reports. AUTLAS organizes it through 100 questions in 20 areas, so people can start with a phenomenon they recognize and understand the wider system to which it belongs.

05

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Authoritarian systems change the rules, narrow the range of choices, raise the cost of refusal, and create the impression that nothing can change. AUTLAS therefore analyzes rules, incentives, pressures, and institutional mechanisms - rather than blaming people trying to live and work within such a system.

06

Who is behind AUTLAS?

AUTLAS and AVtokratija were conceived and are being developed by Civic Initiatives. Civic Initiatives is the author and editor of the website and is responsible for topic selection, treatment of sources, and presentation. The content is updated and corrected in line with new research and reliable data.

CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.

Send a relevant source, point out an error, or suggest how an explanation could be clearer. Every submission is reviewed before the content is changed.

Send a source, report an error, or share a suggestion →