AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAVtokratija

How the authoritarian system works in Serbia

General research connected to documented examples, findings, and sources from Serbia.

Start with a question→

100questions

20areas

148academic works

130Serbia sources

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

22How can elections be unfair if no one stole my vote?What elections are for when they are not fair 62Why do people use connections even when they believe connections should not be necessary?Why people stay silent, adapt, and think they are alone 48What happens to institutions when people are hired and promoted mainly for political loyalty?How the system changes public administration and public services 33How does a court lose its independence while remaining independent on paper?How law, courts, and parliament are used 49Why do employees find it harder to say 'no' when their job or term continually depends on a new government decision?How the system changes public administration and public services 36How can an institution be captured if no one ordered every employee what to do?How independent institutions are neutralized and crises are used

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

01How to recognize authoritarian rule and distinguish its forms5 questions 02How democracy disappears step by step5 questions 03Who really rules and what happens after the leader5 questions 04Why the police, military, and security services obey5 questions 05What elections are for when they are not fair5 questions 06How the ruling party and local networks hold the system together5 questions 07How law, courts, and parliament are used5 questions 08How independent institutions are neutralized and crises are used5 questions 09How money, jobs, and state assistance preserve power5 questions 10How the system changes public administration and public services5 questions 11How those in power shape what people can learn5 questions 12How digital surveillance and bad news change power5 questions 13Why people stay silent, adapt, and think they are alone5 questions 14Why people support the government and how power is justified5 questions 15How associations, unions, schools, and churches are controlled5 questions 16How the system punishes and intimidates without open violence5 questions 17How people organize and when protest changes power5 questions 18How an authoritarian system falls and what remains afterward5 questions 19How authoritarian rulers use support from abroad5 questions 20How democracy is defended and rebuilt5 questions

06 / 20

WHY THIS AREA MATTERS

How the ruling party and local networks hold the system together

The party and local intermediaries connect the top of the government with jobs, services, and citizens' everyday needs. Political support can then become a condition for something that should be a right.

QUESTIONS IN THIS AREA

26What does a ruling party do besides win elections?27How do local party figures become the link between citizens, services, and the top of government?28How do party membership or activism become a route to a job, contract, or protection?29When does state assistance stop being a right and become a tool of political pressure?30When does the ruling party protect the system, and when does it become a threat to the leader?

Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

How do local party figures become the link between citizens, services, and the top of government?

Confidence in the conclusionquite substantiated, with important conditions

key academic works5

linked Serbia sources10

Period201226

ANSWER FROM THE MATRIX

Local party people become mediators when the citizen comes to work, help, permits or talks with the institution more easily through them than through regular procedure. The mediator knows who to call, can speed up the procedure and convey the problem to the top, but in return often asks for political support, attendance at the rally, family votes or information about others.

The top of the government thus gets a network that simultaneously shares benefits and measures loyalty on the ground. People often do not enter into such a relationship because they consider it fair, but because their formal path is slow, uncertain or closed. Not all help from the party man is political trade; the key difference is whether the citizen can exercise the same right without personal connection, favor and fear of consequences.

SERBIA CASE STUDY

Example from SerbiaChecked 10 sources; 8 manufacturers

10 related sources; 8 groups of evidence producers; domestic NGOs/research producers: 8

In many municipalities, the citizen does not only go to the institution, but is looking for a person who “can finish”. Local party people mediate between the top authorities, directors, social work center, public enterprises and voters. They can speed up assistance or employment, but in return expect political gratitude, attendance at a rally or a vote. The right thus becomes a service awarded by the network.

How the finding is separated in the matrix

01Established fact

CRTA’s research on social work centres and political pressures describes local mediators and hierarchical links; LTI shows poor transparency of local decisions and public companies.

02Our interpretation

The mediator is useful to the authorities because he knows who is looking for what and who is ready to retaliate. The citizen solves the problem in the short term, but in the long term weakens the equal right and drives him into personal dependence.

03Does it show the same process?

Yes the mechanism is well documented qualitatively and supported by data on poor local transparency.

04Important caveat or alternative explanation

Not all help from councillors or party activists is clientelism. The border is crossed when public law is conditioned by political support or when the mediator bypasses the rules that apply to others.

LIMITS OF THE CONCLUSION

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

Local mediator can really help people and not all help is political trade. The question is whether the service is conditional on support and whether there is a fair second time.

GENERAL RESEARCH BASE

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

Explain how the system works

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M. i Brusco, V. (2013), Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism, Cambridge University Press.

Contribution to this answer: Stokes and co-authors show how local brokers use personal knowledge of voters to distribute business, aid and other benefits and connect them to political support.

How the authoritarian system works in Serbia

Which question do you want to start with?

How the ruling party and local networks hold the system together

How the finding is separated in the matrix

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M. i Brusco, V. (2013), Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism, Cambridge University Press.

Hicken, A. (2011), „Clientelism“, Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289–310.

Hicken, A. i Nathan, N. L. (2020), „Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics“, Annual Review of Political Science 23: 277–294.

Blaydes, L. (2011), Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt, Cambridge University Press.

Petrović, V. (2026), „Under Pressure: The Politics of Clientelism and Coercion in Serbia“, Democratization.

CRTA. 2023. Mreža političkih pritisaka u centrima za socijalni rad. Beograd: CRTA.

Vuković, Danilo, i Marija Stefanović. 2024. “Leaving No One Behind: Party Clientelism in Social Welfare in Serbia.” Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade 72(4): 697–722. https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24404A

Transparentnost Srbija. 2024. Indeks transparentnosti lokalne samouprave LTI 2024. Beograd: Transparentnost Srbija.

Cvejić, Slobodan. 2016. “On Inevitability of Political Clientelism in Contemporary Serbia.” Sociologija 58(2): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1602239C

Petrović, Valentina. 2025. “Under Pressure: The Politics of Clientelism and Coercion in Serbia.” Democratization, online first: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2520349

Vuković, Danilo, i Bojan Spaić. 2022. “Parallel Normative Reality: The Informal Order of Corruption and Clientelism in Serbia.” Sociologija 64(4): 519–542. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2204519V

Lazić, Uroš. 2025. “Predictors of Party Patronage: A Case of the City Committee of a Serbian Parliamentary Political Entity in 2015.” Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 25(1): 111–148. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.1.3

Dragojević, Mila, and Andy Konitzer. 2013. “The Forensics of Patronage: Identifying the Linkage Between Parties and Public Sector Employment in Serbia.” Sociološki pregled 47(1): 3–22.

Transparentnost Srbija. 2024. Public Enterprises — A Symbol of Abuses and Violation of the Law. Belgrade: Transparency Serbia.

Transparency Serbia. 2024. Assessing Political Integrity Rules in Serbia. Belgrade: Transparency Serbia.

Based on academic research

Practice documented in Serbia

Sources open to scrutiny

Why questions?

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Who is behind AUTLAS?

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.